MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124364125 · doi:10.1002/jez.a.239

Sperm nuclear basic proteins of two closely related species of scorpaeniform fish (Sebastes maliger, Sebastolobus sp.) with different sexual reproduction and the evolution of fish protamines

2006· article· en· W2124364125 on OpenAlexaff
Lindsay J. Frehlick, José M. Eirín‐López, Adelina Prado, Hua Wei Su, Harold E. Kasinsky, Juan Ausió

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Experimental Zoology Part A Comparative Experimental Biology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScorpaenidaeBiologyProtamineSebastesSpermFish <Actinopterygii>RockfishEvolutionary biologyZoologyContext (archaeology)GeneticsFisheryBiochemistryPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present a review of sperm nuclear basic proteins (SNBPs) in teleost fish. The distribution of the three basic groups of SNBPs [histone (H)-type, protamine-like (PL)-type and protamine (P)-type], their evolution and possible relation to the mode of fertilization are described. In this regard, we have characterized the SNBPs from two closely related species of Scorpaeniform fish: internally fertilizing Sebastes maliger and externally fertilizing Sebastolobus sp., both in the family Scorpaenidae. Despite the different reproductive behavior of these two closely related rockfish species, in both instances the SNBP consists of protamines. However, there is a significant increase in the arginine content of the protamine in the internally fertilizing rockfish. The relevance of this observation is discussed within the context of the P-type SNBP in teleosts. The rapid evolution of teleost protamines, including those in rockfish, has also allowed us to obtain a molecular phylogeny for this group of bony fish that is almost indistinguishable from that currently available from the use of conventional anatomical/paleontological markers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.791

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Experimental Zoology Part A Comparative Experimental BiologySame topicGenetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal AbnormalitiesFrench-language works237,207