MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124408307 · doi:10.1163/156855400300185333

Effect of surface treatment on mode I interlaminar fracture behaviour of plain glass woven fabric composites: Part I. Report of the 2nd round-robin test results

2000· article· en· W2124408307 on OpenAlex
Jang‐Kyo Kim, Man‐Lung Sham, H. Hamada, Y. Hirai, K. Fujihara, Hossein Saidpour, Mutlu Sezen, Yubing Dong, Hyun Seok Yang, Yuming Bai, Tan Mao, Claude Bathias, Suong V. Hoa, A. Boutella, Anh Dung Ngô, Patricia Krawczak, R. Bequignat, J. Pabiot, S. Pinter, György Bánhegyi, L. T. Drzal, H. Ho, C. Y. Yue, K. A. Padmanabhan, Yoshiharu Suzuki, Toshio Tanimoto, Karl Schulte, J.K. Karger-Kocsis, W.J. Cantwell, R. Zulkitli, Lin Ye, John J. Lesko, Kledermon Garcia

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueComposite Interfaces · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Behavior of Composites
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceComposite materialFracture toughnessFracture (geology)Round robin testSilaneComposite numberWoven fabricCoupling (piping)Plain weaveVinyl esterFracture mechanicsPolymerCopolymerMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A round-robin test programme has been carried out to characterise the mode I interlaminar fracture behaviour of E-glass woven fabric reinforced vinyl ester matrix composites. Special emphasis has been placed on the effect of silane coupling agent on the stability of interlaminar crack propagation and fracture toughness. Sixteen laboratories participated in this programme. Each laboratory was supplied with composite laminates of thicknesses of its own choice and conducted the tests according to its own procedures. The results showed that variations in interlaminar fracture toughness between laboratories were very large in spite of slight differences in the test procedures used, such as specimen dimensions, test speed and data reduction schemes. Nevertheless, the general trends were clearly identified with respect to different silane coupling agents. Other observations and the implications are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.140
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it