Bibliographic record
Abstract
Continued from Part I published earlier this year, this part of the survey covers materials reflecting Chinese practice in 2006 relating to: Fundamental principles of international law (Section IV; territorial integrity, including Taiwan issue and Tibet issue, non-interference of internal affairs and friendly co-operation); International law of recognition (Section V; recognition of States and governments); International peace and security (Section VI; North Korea nuclear issue, Iranian nuclear issue, Darfur issue, Kosovo issue, Great Lake region issue, Lebanon–Israel conflict issue and Middle East issue); Anti-terrorism (Section VII); Non-proliferation and disarmament (Section VIII; general policy, nuclear disarmament, Treaty on Nuclear Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT), Treaty on the Central Asia Nuclear Weapon Free Area, Security Assurances for non-nuclear-weapon States, Fissile Material Cut-off Treaty (FMCT), Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction (BWC), Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW), Ottawa Convention, Non-Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMDs) and Missiles, Illicit Trade in SALW, UN Disarmament Commission, Conference of Disarmament (CD) and Prevention of an Arms Race in Outer Space (PAROS)); International Law on Territory and Frontier (Section IX; Diaoyu Islands, Nansha Islands, China–India Territorial and Frontier Dispute, China–Russia Frontier); International Law of the Sea (Section X; UN Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf, Conservation of Marine Bio-diversity Beyond Areas of National Jurisdiction, Fishery, Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resource, Marine Navigation, Delimitation and Development Disputes with Japan in East China Sea, Principle of Maritime Delimitation with Other Countries, Base Points of the Chinese Territorial Sea and The Issue of Suyan Islet).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".