FGF‐2‐induced cell proliferation stimulates anatomical, neurophysiological and functional recovery from neonatal motor cortex injury
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Infant rats treated with basic fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2) after postnatal day (P)10 motor cortical injury, show functional improvement in adulthood relative to those that do not receive FGF-2. In this study we used a combination of behavioural, immunohistochemical, electrophysiological, electron microscopic and teratological approaches to investigate possible mechanisms by which FGF-2 may influence functional recovery. We show that subcutaneous injections of FGF-2 following bilateral lesions to the motor cortex at P10 in the rat leads to filling of the lesion area with migrating neuroblasts and cycling cells. We assessed the functionality of this tissue in adulthood, and show that cells from the filled region spontaneously fire and form synapses. Behavioural analysis shows enhanced motor performance in the FGF-2-treated lesion rats in comparison to vehicle-treated lesion rats, and this improvement is reversed by removal of the tissue from the previously lesioned area or by blocking cortical regeneration by embryonic treatment with bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU). The results show that FGF-2 stimulates filling of the lesion cavity with cells after neonatal motor cortex lesions, that the new tissue has anatomical and physiological properties similar to control tissue, and that the filled region supports motor behaviour.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".