MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Induction of Protective Immunity against<i>Schistosoma mansoni</i>via DNA Priming and Boosting with the Large Subunit of Calpain (Sm-p80): Adjuvant Effects of Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor and Interleukin-4

2003· article· en· W2124457777 on OpenAlexaff
Afzal A. Siddiqui, Troy Phillips, Hugues Charest, Ron B. Podesta, Martha L. Quinlin, Justin R. Pinkston, Jenny D. Lloyd, M. Tercero Paz, Rachael M. Villalovos, Janet Pompa

Bibliographic record

VenueInfection and Immunity · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicParasites and Host Interactions
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversitySte. Anne's Hospital
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Institutes of HealthTexas Tech University Health Sciences Center
KeywordsBiologyDNA vaccinationImmunogenicityImmune systemImmunologySchistosoma mansoniImmunityVirologySchistosomiasisMicrobiologyImmunizationHelminths

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Considerable morbidity and mortality result from schistosomiasis, an affliction affecting an estimated 200 million people. Although schistosomicidal drugs and other control measures (including public hygiene and snail control) exist, the advent of an efficacious vaccine remains the most potentially powerful means for controlling this disease. We have targeted a vaccine candidate (large subunit of calpain, Sm-p80) because of its consistent immunogenicity, protective potential, and integral role in surface membrane biogenesis of schistosomes. Since surface membrane renewal appears to be one of the major phenomena employed by schistosomes to evade the host's immune system; an immune response directed against Sm-p80 should render the parasite susceptible to immune clearance from the host by both providing a focus of attack and by potentially impairing the membrane repair process. In the present study, we have employed DNA immunization protocols using Sm-p80 with plasmids encoding granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and interleukin-4 (IL-4). Sm-p80 by itself provided 39% protection (P = < or =0.0001) against challenge infection in C57BL/6 mice. This protection was increased to 44% (P = < or =0.0001) when the plasmid encoding GM-CSF was coadministered with Sm-p80 DNA. Coinjection of plasmid DNA encoding IL-4 with Sm-p80 DNA yielded a protection level of 42% (P = < or =0.0001). Statistically, the protection conferred by including GM-CSF, but not IL-4, was significantly greater than that when only Sm-p80 was used. Sm-p80 DNA by itself elicited strong responses that include IgG2A and IgG2B antibody isotypes. The introduction of GM-CSF DNA with Sm-p80 DNA led to distinct increases in total IgG and IgG1 titers, whereas the coadministration of IL-4 DNA with Sm-p80 DNA resulted in a slight elevation of IgG1 and IgG3 titers and in some reduction of IgG2A and IgG2B titers. Our data again indicate that Sm-p80 can be an excellent candidate for a schistosomiasis vaccine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations61
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInfection and ImmunitySame topicParasites and Host InteractionsFrench-language works237,207