MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124623331 · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020378

Clinical Trial Registration: The Differing Views of Industry, the WHO, and the Ottawa Group

2005· article· en· W2124623331 on OpenAlexaffabout
Karmela Krleža-Jerić

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS Medicine · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institutes of Health Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClinical trialMedicineGroup (periodic table)Family medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Policy Forum allows health policy makers around the world to discuss challenges and opportunities for improving health care in their societies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.253
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.532
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Reporting · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.747
Threshold uncertainty score0.921

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.2530.532
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0130.004
Bibliometrics0.0080.023
Science and technology studies0.0070.012
Scholarly communication0.0190.010
Open science0.0120.008
Research integrity0.0350.027
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0880.055

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.599
GPT teacher head0.491
Teacher spread0.108 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
DomainReporting
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS MedicineSame topicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeFrench-language works237,207