MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124634594 · doi:10.1186/1710-1492-9-9

Newly diagnosed chronic granulomatous disease in a 44 year old male presenting with recurrent groin cellulitis and colitis

2013· article· en· W2124634594 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Arthur G Chung, Michael M Cyr, Anne K. Ellis

Bibliographic record

VenueAllergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicNeutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsKingston General HospitalMcMaster UniversityQueen's UniversityOakville-Trafalgar Memorial Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineChronic granulomatous diseasePrimary immunodeficiencyScrotumInguinal lymphadenopathyFamily historyPast medical historyGastroenterologySurgeryInternal medicinePathologyDiseaseImmunologyBiopsy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chronic Granulomatous Disease (CGD) is an inherited deficiency which results from the absence or dysfunction of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase subunits in phagocytic cells. This condition is usually diagnosed in early childhood and presents with recurrent infections at epithelial surfaces such as the skin, lungs, and gut. We present a case of CGD which was diagnosed late in adulthood. A forty-four year old male was admitted to hospital with fever, testicular pain and an acute onset of swelling of his penis and scrotum. His past history was significant for Crohn’s disease diagnosed at age sixteen; stable on treatment with mesalamine (Asacol®). He also had recurrent soft tissue infections of his penis and/or scrotum since childhood, approximately 2 or 3 in total, to his recollection. There was no history of abscesses or sexually transmitted infections. However, the patient did complain of frequent upper respiratory tract infections each winter. He had no family history of primary immunodeficiency disease. During admission, he was assessed by urology and general surgery. Both confirmed the absence of any anatomic abnormalities. An immunologist suggested work up for immunodeficiency. Basic laboratory investigations were normal, with a white blood cell count of 7.8 × 10 L. C-reactive protein was elevated at 69.7 mg/L. Both his rheumatoid factor and HIV testing were negative. Serum levels of IgA, IgM and IgG levels were all within normal limits (Table 1 reports full details of his immunology investigations) Blood cultures were negative. A CT scan of the chest was normal. CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis revealed no subcutaneous air to suggest a necrotizing infection. Quantitative dihydrorhodamine (DHR)123 flow cytometry assay revealed the complete absence of an oxidative burst response; this was confirmed three times. This was suggestive of a neutrophil NADPH oxidase deficiency associated with CGD. The patient was treated with intravenous cefazolin and metronidazole and discharged home on clindamycin. His cellulitis resolved within weeks, but he experienced a recurrence approximately 6 months later. He was started on trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), amoxicillin, and itraconazole as prophylactic therapy to prevent future infections. He was assessed by the Infectious Disease service, who simplified his prophylactic regimen to TMP-SMX 160/800 q Mon/Wed/Fri and Penicillin V K 300mg OD based on risk assessment and previous infective patterns. Interferon-gamma was considered, but based on restricted availability at the time and his relatively stable clinical course to date, we elected to pursue antibiotic prophylaxis and active surveillance alone. Genetic testing, performed by the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, confirmed a diagnosis of CGD and revealed a homozygous mutation in the NCFI gene (P47). It was recommended that directly family members receive DHR flow cytometry screening but this was declined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0050.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAllergy Asthma and Clinical ImmunologySame topicNeutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative MechanismsFrench-language works237,207