Histopathological Diagnosis of Corneal Button Specimens: An Epidemiological Study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the most common histopathological diagnosis of corneal specimens from penetrating keratoplasty (PKP). METHODS: The records of 500 corneal specimens submitted to biopsy at the Henry Witelson Ocular Pathology Laboratory, Montreal, Canada, from 1999 to 2004 were reviewed. Age, sex, clinical indications, and histopathological findings were analyzed. RESULTS: Chronic keratitis (45.6%) was the most common pathological diagnosis, followed by corneal edema (25.8%), dystrophy (12.8%), keratoconus (KC) (9.2%), acute keratitis (5.6%), and degeneration (1.0%). Among the specimens with chronic keratitis, regraft was the most common clinical indication (39.0%). In the group of acute keratitis, ulcerative condition was the leading cause (75,0%). Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy represented 79.7% of the clinical diagnoses in the group of corneal dystrophies. The median patient age was 70-79 years, and the gender distribution was nearly symmetric. CONCLUSION: The present study is important for determining the most common histopathological diagnoses of corneal button specimens and the correlation with the age, gender, and clinical indications of PKP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it