MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124660867 · doi:10.2110/jsr.2014.5

Cross-Bedded Woody Debris From A Pliocene Forested River System In the High Arctic: Beaufort Formation, Meighen Island, Canada

2014· article· en· W2124660867 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Neil S. Davies, John Gosse, Natalia Rybczynski

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sedimentary Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicForest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Museum of NatureDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaW. Garfield Weston FoundationGarfield Weston Foundation
KeywordsGeologyBeaufort scaleDebrisArcticBeaufort seaThe arcticOceanographyPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: Cross-bedding, the inclined internal stratification that records the migration of certain transverse sedimentary bedforms, is nearly ubiquitous in current-transported bedload sediments. Although examples of the structure are known from inorganic clastic sediments and sedimentary rocks from practically all depositional environments and intervals of geologic history, here we report cross-bedded lenses that are composed wholly or significantly of woody debris, in Pliocene alluvium of the Beaufort Formation in the Canadian High Arctic. The uniqueness of cross-bedded woody debris has hitherto been overlooked, but we demonstrate that, in the entire Phanerozoic record, it is apparently restricted to alluvium deposited during a warm climatic interval that permitted the growth of boreal-type forests within 10° latitude of the North Pole. The marked spatiotemporal restriction of cross-bedded woody debris implies that there may be environmental factors, unique to polar forests, which promote the subaqueous transport of large amounts of fine woody debris as fluvial bedload. We propose a non-uniformitarian conceptual model for the formation of cross-bedded woody debris in forested polar rivers whereby an exceptional abundance of woody debris could accumulate, and become saturated and denser than water, due to reduced decomposition on forest floors that were subject to prolonged periods of darkness and subzero temperatures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.170
Threshold uncertainty score0.502

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2014
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Sedimentary ResearchSame topicForest Ecology and Biodiversity StudiesFrench-language works237,207