Hybrid Periodic Mesoporous Organosilicas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this study we report the synthesis of a new class of materials called hybrid periodic mesoporous organosilicas (HPMOs). By coupling a silsesquioxane precursor through at least two chemical linkages to the mesopore walls of a pre‐existing periodic mesoporous silica (PMS) or periodic mesoporous organosilica (PMO). Many of the problems of a conventional PMO material can be avoided while ensuring efficient use of the bridging organic functional groups of the silsesquioxane. We demonstrate this concept for PMS by anchoring various silsesquioxanes, such as ethene and ethane silsesquioxanes, to the mesopore walls of the PMS. The addition of anchored silsesquioxane monolayers and multilayers to the mesopore walls also allows for the strict control of the diameter of the mesopore as well as the mesopore wall thickness in the final HPMO material. Additionally it is shown that having the silsesquioxane located solely on the surface of the mesopores in HPMOs gives increased chemical accessibility of the organic bridge‐bonded moiety when compared with their PMO counterparts containing the bridge‐bonded organic both on the surface and within the pore walls.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.052 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".