Marketing cost and marketing margin of wheat in Durg district of Chhattisgarh
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An attempt has been made in this paper to examine the marketing cost and marketing margin of wheat in Durg district of Chhattisgarh state. The study was conducted in Durg district of Chhattisgarh state with forty farmers who were selected randomly from four villages and 10 wheat growers from each of the selected village considered to collect the required information. The primary data were collected from the wheat producers through personal interview method with the help of well prepare scheduled and questionnaire for the production and marketing year 2010-11. The simple mean and average method was used to work out the marketing cost and marketing margins in wheat trade. It was observed that farmers sale their produce to village traders 17.67 per cent and 3.12 per cent during the first and second quarter, respectively. The quantity sale to the wholesaler was observed as 33.08 per cent and 46.13 per cent in first quarter and second quarter, respectively. The marketing cost computed as Rs.5, Rs.19.90 and Rs. 61.40 per quintal in channel-I while it was observed as Rs. 17.18 and 61.40 per quintal in channel-II. Whereas the net marketing margin was computed as Rs.991, Rs. 64.10 and Rs.88.60 per quintal in channel-I while it was observed as Rs. 1055.82 and 95.62 per quintal in channel-II.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it