MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124738583 · doi:10.1016/j.sjpain.2012.05.056

Mechanical sensitivity in migraine patients during attack, remission, and pain-free periods:A preliminary study

2012· article· en· W2124738583 on OpenAlexaff
Anne Jensen, Morten R. Sørensen, Ali Karshenas, Flemming W. Bach, Brian E. Cairns, Lars Arendt‐Nielsen, Parisa Gazerani

Bibliographic record

VenueScandinavian Journal of Pain · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMigraine and Headache Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMigraineHeadachesAllodyniaAnesthesiaSensationNociceptionThreshold of painInternal medicineSurgeryHyperalgesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background/aims Data on mechanical sensitivity and cutaneous allodynia in different types and phases of migraine headaches are limited. Existence and pattern of such symptoms may advance the understanding of neurophysiological mechanisms, assist clinical evaluation of the patients, and further improve management. Hence, in a large controlled study on migraine patients, mechanical sensitivity and cutaneous allodynia were assessed together with clinical markers. Methods Sensitivity to mechanical stimuli was measured in migraine patients during attack (within 2 h of headache onset), within remission phase (48–72 h after headache onset), and in pain-free periods (>5 days pain-free) in comparison with sex-and age-matched healthy controls. Pin-prick stimulation was performed in the temple region in the pain-referred side using weight-calibrated pins (8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256 mN) in a randomized order (3 stimuli lasting 2 s), with the patient rating the sensation on a 10-point numerical scale. Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) was assessed using a handheld algometer (1 cm 2 rubber probe) over the anterior aspect of the temporal muscle (30 kPa/s, 3 times). Results Preliminary analysis revealed increased mechanical sensitivity to Pin-prick during all phases in migraine patients ( n = 4) compared to healthy controls ( n = 5), and likewise increased during attack and remission phases compared to pain-free periods within patients. PPT, assessing mainly muscle nociception, showed a tendency to decline during attack and remission phases (89 ± 13% and 82 ± 6%, respectively) compared to pain-free periods, with even higher sensitivity during attack and remission phases (80 ± 12% and 75 ± 11.1%, respectively) compared to healthy controls. Conclusions The current preliminary observed tendencies imply the presence of mechanical hypersensitivity in migraine patients with a notable change during attack and remission phases. This study is ongoing and no firm conclusion can be stated. In addition, alteration of mechanical sensitivity in different phases will be correlated to objective assessments of biological markers in serum specimens of the study population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.626

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScandinavian Journal of PainSame topicMigraine and Headache StudiesFrench-language works237,207