Hydrogen-bonding interactions in acetic acid monohydrates and dihydrates by density-functional theory calculations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Equilibrium structures and the respective binding energies of acetic acid monohydrates and dihydrates have been determined by density-functional theory calculations with different basis sets, including 6-31+G(3d,p), 6-311++G(d,p), and 6-311++G(3df,3pd). Given that the C=O and OH groups in acetic acid provide the predominant hydrogen-bonding interactions with water, six stable conformer structures have been found each for the monohydrate and syn-dihydrate. Of the three syn- and three anti-conformers of acetic acid with water, the most stable monohydrate structure is found to be that of the syn-conformer bonding with water in a cyclic double H-bonded geometry. Similarly, the syn-conformer bonding with two water molecules in a cyclic double H-bonded geometry has also been determined to be the most stable among the six plausible structures for the syn-dihydrate. Frequency analysis of the stable conformers has been performed and the vibrational spectra of the most stable monohydrate and dihydrate structures are compared with the experimental gas-phase and matrix data. Furthermore, the calculated binding energies between an acetic acid and a water molecule for both monohydrate and dihydrate are larger than that between two water molecules, which supports our recent experimental observation of coevaporation of acetic acid with water upon annealing acetic acid on ice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".