Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Raltitrexed was developed as a direct and specific inhibitor of thymidylate synthase. Early clinical trials showed similar activity to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), mainly in metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). METHODS: Pharmacokinetics are summarized and Phase III adjuvant and MCRC trials of raltitrexed are reviewed. RESULTS: Response rates and overall survival with raltitrexed in MCRC are equivalent to 5-FU. Pooled analysis showed relapse free survival was 1 month longer with 5-FU compared with raltitrexed. Grade 3+ toxicity rates with raltitrexed compare favorably with 5-FU. Unexpectedly, however, treatment-related mortality (TRM) was greater with raltitrexed, mainly due to protocol violations. TRM was also greater in the adjuvant trial, leading to its discontinuation. In spite of excess TRM, much of which could have been avoided, overall survival was the same as with 5-FU. Quality of life was variously reported as better or inferior to 5-FU. CONCLUSION: The simple once every 3 week regimen of raltitrexed has not fulfilled its promise. Meanwhile, the field change in MCRC management has left little space for raltitrexed. Withdrawal of the sponsor's support has left raltitrexed without the level of continuing investigation afforded to 5-FU. The use of raltitrexed in Canada is limited to patients exhibiting intolerance - mucosal, hematological and cardiac - to 5-FU.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".