MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2124918617 · doi:10.1093/biohorizons/hzq023

Factors affecting the abundance and size of Pisaster ocharceus in the rocky intertidal zone of southern British Columbia

2010· article· en· W2124918617 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
H. K. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueBioscience Horizons The International Journal of Student Research · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal plant biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntertidal zoneAbiotic componentEcologyHabitatAbundance (ecology)Intertidal ecologyBiotic componentTransectBiologyBelt transectSpecies richness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigates the abiotic and biotic factors that affect the abundance and distribution of the sea star Pisaster ocharceus in the intertidal zone of Southern British Columbia (B.C.). P. ochraceus is very important to the intertidal community as it is seen as a keystone species because when its numbers are reduced, mussels are seen to out-compete all other organisms, reducing the species richness of the community. Climate change is expected to impact strongly on intertidal habitats and there is a strong possibility that intertidal habitats may serve as a bellwether for change in other ecosystems. During June and July 2008, 16 sites were visited along the south coast of B.C., 12 abiotic and biotic variables were recorded and all P. ochraceus individuals were counted and measured within a 50 m transect at each site. Across all sites, 25% contained no P. ochraceus. The abundance of sea stars ranged from 0 to 255 individuals. The mean size (diameter) of individuals ranged from 4.7 to 23.5 cm. Human disturbance (P = 0.001) was found to be significant, negatively linked to the size of P. ochraceus. Although no significant results were found with regard to the abundance of P. ochraceus, human disturbance (P = 0.080) and exposed sites (P = 0.079) just failed to reach significance. These finding indicate that anthropogenic factors such as human disturbance are having a negative impact of P. ochraceus. This study serves as a pilot for further research in this area, a more in depth large-scale study of P. ochraceus is needed to obtain greater insight into its abundance and size distribution and the factors which influence them.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.146

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBioscience Horizons The International Journal of Student Research→Same topicMarine and coastal plant biology→French-language works237,207→