Ice Bridges on the St. Lawrence River as an Index of Winter Severity from 1620 to 1910
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Temperature reconstruction of the last thousand years suggests that an unprecedented warming (+0.6°C) occurred over the globe in the last century. However, regional variations in climate are not resolved by Northern Hemisphere reconstructions. In northeastern North America, past climate and, particularly, past winter variations are poorly known. Here, the authors report on the variation of a winter temperature index during the 1620–1910 period, based on the ice bridge formation (IBF) rate on the Saint Lawrence River at Québec City (Canada), combined with instrumental data (1876–2000). During this 300-yr period, the IBF rate shows that winters in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries were warmer than those in the nineteenth century. In particular, the IBF rate suggests that winter severity culminated in the 1850–1900 period, while very few ice bridges were reported between 1620 and 1740, presumably because of warmer temperatures and the relative scarcity of historical documents for the 1680–1740 period. These data suggest that winter temperature, particularly between ∼1800 and 1910, was 2.4° to 4.0°C colder than the last 30-yr average. Major volcanic eruptions had a significant positive impact on IBF rates, which is consistent with their role as important climate-forcing events.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".