MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125086946 · doi:10.1109/ultsym.2007.268

12A-1 Concentration Requirements for Subharmonic Quantitative Contrast Enhanced High Frequency Ultrasound Flow Studies

2007· article· en· W2125086946 on OpenAlexafffund
Shawn Stapleton, A. Needles, E. Elizabeth Henderson, F. Stuart Foster

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings/Proceedings - IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentreFujiFilm VisualSonics (Canada)University of Toronto
FundersNational Cancer InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMicrobubblesUltrasoundBiomedical engineeringBlood flowMaterials scienceChemistryPhysicsAcousticsMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ability to perform quantitative haemodynamic measurements in the microcirculation using high frequency ultrasound and microbubbles is dependent on the ability to suppress tissue signals and the concentration of the agent. While tissue suppression has been accomplished by exploiting nonlinear properties of microbubbles, it is still unclear as to the optimal dose to facilitate flow studies. A dose response study of the contrast Agent MicroMarker was performed in the renal cortex of a mouse to get an indication of the optimal range of doses. A transmit pulse of 30 MHz, 20% bandwidth and peak negative pressure (PNP) of 1 MPa was used to elicit a 15 MHz subharmonic response from the agent. Doses up to 300 muL kg <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">-1</sup> , corresponding to 10 million bubbles per mL of blood, were investigated. Experiments showed a wash-in phase which took approximately 3 to 5 seconds, followed by a plateau in signal which lasted for approximately 40 to 50 seconds and a slow washout phase. The average enhancement calculated over the plateau peaked at 4.5 times (6.5 dB) over the noise floor. The duration of enhancement increased with dose up to 230 seconds. The integrated enhancement (area under the time intensity curves) was linear over the range of doses investigated. The variability between mice was 10% to 20% for doses between 20 and 100 muL kg <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">-1</sup> . A dose of 40 % was observed for a dose of 300 muL kg <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">-1</sup> and is believed to be due to microbubbles-induced attenuation. This study has established the utility of microbubble contrast agents for quantitative flow imaging in the microcirculation using high frequency ultrasound for doses up to 300 muL kg <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">-1</sup> dose range. However, larger doses should be investigated in order to improve enhancement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings/Proceedings - IEEE Ultrasonics SymposiumSame topicUltrasound and Hyperthermia ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207