MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125108365 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2010.2079070

An Unbalanced Temporal Pulse-Shaping System for Chirped Microwave Waveform Generation

2010· article· en· W2125108365 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Fiber Laser Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWaveformChirpOpticsMicrowaveDispersion (optics)Ultrashort pulsePulse shapingFiber Bragg gratingFourier transformPulse (music)PhysicsMaterials scienceSweep frequency response analysisAcousticsOptical fiber

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An unbalanced temporal pulse-shaping (TPS) system for chirped microwave waveform generation is proposed and demonstrated. The proposed system consists of an ultrashort pulsed source, a Mach-Zehnder modulator and two dispersive elements. The dispersions of the two dispersive elements are opposite in sign, but not identical in magnitude. The entire system is equivalent to a conventional balanced TPS system with two complementary dispersive elements for real-time Fourier transformation and a third dispersive element to achieve a second real-time Fourier transformation. The key contribution of this work is that the third-order dispersion of the dispersive elements is considered, which leads to the generation of a frequency-chirped microwave waveform. A theoretical analysis is performed in which a mathematical model that relates the second- and third-order dispersion of the dispersive elements and the chirp rate of the generated microwave waveform is developed. The theoretical model is then verified by numerical simulations and an experiment. A chirped microwave waveform with different chirp rates of -0.0535 and 0.715 GHz/ns by tuning the third-order dispersion using a tunable chirped fiber Bragg grating is experimentally demonstrated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.609
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it