MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mobile Phones: Just a Phone or a Language Learning Device?

2011· article· en· W2125132579 on OpenAlex
Taher Bahranı

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCross-cultural communication · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Learning in Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMobile phoneMobile technologyComputer scienceLanguage acquisitionMultimediaHumanitiesLinguisticsMobile deviceSociologyPedagogyWorld Wide WebTelecommunicationsArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Today, mobile assisted language learning (MALL) is growing very fast. In the same line, mobile phone technology is dominating the world so fast that everybody including language learners has at least one which can be used all the time and everywhere. Considering this issue, the present paper attempts to shed more light on the pre-existed pedagogical value of using the emerging technologies such as mobile phones for language learning in informal language learning setting. The present paper holds the view that everybody can learn the very amount of English language which he/she needs even if he/she cannot go to any language classes. Accordingly, this paper reviews the literature addressing opportunities for learning English language with mobile learning technology and various language education projects involving mobile phones. Moreover, it suggests technology-besed design considerations for reading skill to meet the learning needs of those who want to learn the language in informal setting by themselves. Key words : Mobile Technology; Pedegogical; Learning; Informal Setting Resume: Aujourd'hui, l'apprentissage des langues assiste mobile (ALAM) est en croissance tres rapide. Dans le meme domaine, la technologie du telephone mobile est en train de dominer le monde si vite que tout le monde y compris les apprenants de langue a au moins un telephone mobile qui peut etre utilise tout le temps et partout. En prenant en consideration cette question, le present article tente d'eclaire la valeur pedagogique preexistee de l'utilisation des technologies emergentes telles que les telephones mobiles pour l'apprentissage des langues dans un cadre de l'apprentissage des langues informel. Le present document est d'avis que tout le monde peut apprendre la langue anglaise dont il/elle en a besoin, meme s'il/elle ne peut pas aller a un cours de langue. Par consequent, cet article passe en revue les possibilites d'apprentissage de la langue anglaise avec la technologie d'apprentissage mobile et de divers projets d'education de langue impliquant le telephone mobile. En outre, il suggere des conceptions basees sur la technologie pour que les competences de lecture puissent repondre aux besoins de l'apprentissage de ceux qui veulent apprendre la langue par eux-memes dans un cadre informel. Mots-cles: Technologie Mobile; Pedagogique; Apprentissage; Cadre Informel

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.497
Threshold uncertainty score0.914

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it