MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125136806 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.051679

Time variations in the risk of myocardial infarction among elderly users of COX-2 inhibitors

2006· article· en· W2125136806 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Linda E. Lévesque

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsRofecoxibCelecoxibMedicineMyocardial infarctionConfidence intervalInternal medicineProportional hazards modelRelative riskPopulationCohort studyCohortLower riskCyclooxygenase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The timing of cardiovascular risks associated with the use of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors is unclear. Using data collected in a previous population-based cohort study of elderly people starting nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) therapy, we evaluated the temporal nature of the risk of a first myocardial infarction (MI) associated with the use of rofecoxib and celecoxib. METHODS: We identified people 66 years of age or older without previous MI who were currently taking rofecoxib and celecoxib using Quebec's computerized health databases (January 1999 to June 2002). Data on use and MI outcome were analyzed using a time-matched, nested case-control approach with rate ratios, comparing current users and non-users of rofecoxib and celecoxib in the year preceding the index date, estimated using conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: The risk of MI was highest following first-time use of rofecoxib (adjusted rate ratio [RR] 1.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21-2.30), with events occurring within a median of 9 (6-13) days after therapy was started. The risk increase for first-time use of celecoxib was not statistically significant (RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.90-1.83). Repeated exposure to rofecoxib was associated with a small but statistically nonsignificant delayed risk (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.98-1.40), but no risk was seen with celecoxib (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.82-1.14). Treatment duration was not associated with increasing risk for either agent. The risk remained elevated for the first 7 days after rofecoxib was discontinued (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.05-1.44) but appeared to return to baseline between day 8 and 30 (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.61-1.09). INTERPRETATION: A small proportion of patients using rofecoxib for the first time had their first MI shortly after starting the drug. This risk did not increase with the length of treatment and returned to baseline shortly after treatment was discontinued. More research is needed to identify those most susceptible to cardiotoxicity mediated by COX-2 inhibitor therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations68
Published2006
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association JournalSame topicInflammatory mediators and NSAID effectsFrench-language works237,207