The Impact of Nutrient Density, Feed Form, and Photoperiod on the Walking Ability and Skeletal Quality of Broiler Chickens
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine the main and interaction effects of 3 dietary nutrient densities (low-, medium-, high-density), 2 feed forms (mash, pellet), and 2 lighting programs (20L:4D, 12L:12D) on the walking ability and skeletal quality of broiler chickens raised to a young age (35 d). Forty-eight birds per treatment (nutrient density x feed form x lighting program subclass) were randomly selected (0 d) for assessment of their gait score (GS) and BW at 11, 18, 25, and 32 d. Samples of birds from various GS classifications were selected at 32 d for radiographs and histology of the femur and tibiotarsus. Bone ash (BA) content was evaluated at 35 d from the right tibiotarsus to assess bone quality. Overall, the mean GS values were low (GS <1). An interaction existed between lighting and sex. Males provided with 20L:4D had a higher GS (0.74) than females (0.45), and this score was greater than for broilers provided with 12L:12D (0.34 and 0.26 for males and females, respectively). Feeding mash reduced the GS (0.29) compared with pellet rations (0.62). The GS increased with age, and by 32 d 2.43% of birds had a GS >/=3. Broilers fed mash had a higher BA content (50.6%) than birds fed pellet diets (49.8%), and the 12L:12D value (50.5%) was greater than for 20L:4D (48.9%). Last, males had a lower BA content (49.8%) than females (50.6%). A positive correlation existed between BW and GS based on sex, where BW at 11, 18, and 25 d affected bird mobility at 32 d (r(2) = 0.39, 0.49, and 0.50 for males; r(2) = 0.34, 0.37, and 0.36 for females, respectively). Radiography and histology were unaffected by GS. This study confirmed that a reduced growth rate improved GS but also demonstrated that overall bird mobility was good and the incidence of skeletal disease was low.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it