Astronomy and Astrology in al-Andalus and the Maghrib * By JULIO SAMSO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This collection of papers by an eminent authority on the history of mathematics and astronomy in medieval Andalusia and the Maghreb will be a welcome addition to the library of all scholars with a serious interest in this area. This volume supplements a previous one by the author in the same series, Islamic Astronomy and Medieval Spain, which dealt only with Andalusian and Alfonsine materials. The present collection divides its attention almost equally between al-Andalus (the Iberian peninsula at the time of Muslim rule there) and the Maghreb (northwest Africa), particularly the astronomical handbooks (zijes) produced in this region during the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries that reflect Andalusian material, a topic that the author identifies as ‘the main object of our research during the last fifteen years’. Completing this picture are the author's study of the criticism and gradual abandonment of that tradition during the course of the fourteenth century and its replacement by an Eastern tradition during the latter part of that period.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".