MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125293889 · doi:10.1002/vnl.10356

The effects of plasticizers on the properties of poly(vinyl chloride) foams

2002· article· en· W2125293889 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vinyl and Additive Technology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer Science and PVC
Canadian institutionsMitel (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlasticizerPhthalateVinyl chlorideMaterials sciencePolyvinyl chlorideComposite materialPolymerCopolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The effects of plasticizers on poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) plastisol mixtures were investigated. The investigations were carried out by determining the density of the PVC foam obtained by gelling the plastisol, as well as its elasticity and degree of expansion. Two series of experiments using different types of PVC were performed, using eight plasticizers, individually or as mixtures. Two‐component plasticizer mixtures showed better properties than single‐component plasticizers, and mixtures of di‐iso‐heptyl phthalate (DiHP) and butyl benzyl phthalate (BBP) proved to be the most appropriate. The effect of plasticizer amount also was investigated, and of the three parameters studied, the foam density, which steadily increased with plasticizer amount, was the critical one. It was also shown that in order to obtain consistent results, the foam expansion had to be precisely timed and the temperature carefully chosen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.450

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it