MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125350442 · doi:10.1017/s0954102014000674

A roadmap for Antarctic and Southern Ocean science for the next two decades and beyond

2014· article· en· W2125350442 on OpenAlexaff
M.C. Kennicutt, Steven L. Chown, John J. Cassano, Daniela Liggett, Lloyd S. Peck, Robert A. Massom, Stephen R. Rintoul, J. W. V. Storey, David G. Vaughan, T. J. Wilson, Ian Allison, Jeff Ayton, Renuka Badhe, Jenny Baeseman, P. J. Barrett, Robin E. Bell, Nancy A. N. Bertler, Simen Bø, Angelika Brandt, David H. Bromwich, S. Craig Cary, Melody S. Clark, Peter Convey, Erli Schneider Costa, Don A. Cowan, Robert M. DeConto, Robert B. Dunbar, Chris Elfring, Carlota Escutia, Jane E. Francis, H. A. Fricker, Masaaki Fukuchi, Neil Gilbert, Julian Gutt, Charlotte Havermans, David S. Hik, Graham W. Hosie, Chris Jones, Y.D. Kim, Yvon Le Maho, S.H. Lee, Marcelo Leppe, German Leitchenkov, Xueqi Li, V. Lipenkov, Karin Lochte, Jerónimo López-Martı́nez, Cornelia Lüdecke, W. Berry Lyons, Sergio A. Marenssi, Heinrich Miller, Polina Morozova, T. Naish, Shailesh Nayak, R. Ravindra, José Retamales, C. A. Ricci, Michelle Rogan-Finnemore, Yan Ropert‐Coudert, Azizan Abu Samah, Leopoldo Medina Sansón, T. A. Scambos, Irene R Schloss, Kazuya Shiraishi, Martín J. Siegert, Jefferson Cárdia Simões, Bryan Storey, M. Sparrow, Diana H. Wall, Jessica C. Walsh, G. S. Wilson, Jan‐Gunnar Winther, José C. Xavier, Huigen Yang, William J. Sutherland

Bibliographic record

VenueAntarctic Science · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPolar Research and Ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersInstitut chilien de l'AntarctiqueNatural Environment Research CouncilPolar Research Institute of ChinaNational Institute of Polar ResearchUniversiti MalayaMonash UniversityTinker FoundationAntarctica New ZealandScientific Committee on Antarctic ResearchSight Research UKBritish Antarctic SurveyNew Zealand Antarctic Research Institute
KeywordsEarth system scienceIce sheetEarth scienceAntarctic ice sheetOceanographySea iceGeologyGeographyMeteorologyCryosphere

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Antarctic and Southern Ocean science is vital to understanding natural variability, the processes that govern global change and the role of humans in the Earth and climate system. The potential for new knowledge to be gained from future Antarctic science is substantial. Therefore, the international Antarctic community came together to ‘scan the horizon’ to identify the highest priority scientific questions that researchers should aspire to answer in the next two decades and beyond. Wide consultation was a fundamental principle for the development of a collective, international view of the most important future directions in Antarctic science. From the many possibilities, the horizon scan identified 80 key scientific questions through structured debate, discussion, revision and voting. Questions were clustered into seven topics: i) Antarctic atmosphere and global connections, ii) Southern Ocean and sea ice in a warming world, iii) ice sheet and sea level, iv) the dynamic Earth, v) life on the precipice, vi) near-Earth space and beyond, and vii) human presence in Antarctica. Answering the questions identified by the horizon scan will require innovative experimental designs, novel applications of technology, invention of next-generation field and laboratory approaches, and expanded observing systems and networks. Unbiased, non-contaminating procedures will be required to retrieve the requisite air, biota, sediment, rock, ice and water samples. Sustained year-round access to Antarctica and the Southern Ocean will be essential to increase winter-time measurements. Improved models are needed that represent Antarctica and the Southern Ocean in the Earth System, and provide predictions at spatial and temporal resolutions useful for decision making. A co-ordinated portfolio of cross-disciplinary science, based on new models of international collaboration, will be essential as no scientist, programme or nation can realize these aspirations alone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.023
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.198

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0230.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0100.013
Open science0.0030.010
Research integrity0.0140.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0590.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations211
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAntarctic ScienceSame topicPolar Research and EcologyFrench-language works237,207