Defining the breakpoints of proximal chromosome 14q rearrangements in nine patients using flow-sorted chromosomes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The breakpoints of deletions and translocations in the proximal chromosome 14q region were defined in nine patients, four of whom have not been reported previously. The aberrant chromosomes were isolated by flow cytometry and used to map the chromosome 14 deletion or translocation breakpoints. The parental origins of deletions were ascertained as paternal in five cases and maternal in one. With the draft genomic sequence for human chromosome 14 available, gene searches were performed on selected intervals of the 14q11.2-q21 region to identify candidate genes for the observed phenotype in some of those affected. Gain of function of the gene PAX9 on chromosome 14 is a possible candidate for a t(14;18) patient affected with mesomelic bone dysplasia. Furthermore, a compilation of other human chromosome 14q proximal deletion and translocation cases was obtained from a search on cytogenetic databases. These findings suggest a locus for myelofibrosis at chromosome 14q13. This study contributes to useful information for identifying disease genes in this region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".