MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125622262 · doi:10.1071/rdv26n1ab108

108 COMPARATIVE EFFICIENCY OF GONADOTROPIN-RELEASING HORMONE AND LUTEINIZING HORMONE IN THE INDUCTION OF OVULATION IN SUPEROVULATED ALPACAS

2013· article· en· W2125622262 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
H. W. Vivanco-Mackie, M. D. Ponce-Salazar, M. M. Gonzales, M. Tapia

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBuserelinOvulationLuteinizing hormoneEmbryoBiologyEndocrinologyInternal medicineOvulation inductionHormoneAndrologyGonadotropinEstrous cycleMedicineAgonist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alpacas are induced ovulators, responding to copulation and (or) exogenous application of ovulation-inducing hormones. The objective of this study was to determine the efficiency of the injection of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist versus LH in the induction of ovulation and the presence and size of non-ovulated follicles at the time of embryo collection and its relationship to the yield of transferable embryos in superovulated alpacas. Twenty-one adult (3 to 7 years old) female alpacas under extensive grazing at 4300 m elevation in the Peruvian Andes that had been synchronized and treated for superovulation were induced to ovulate 6 days after the application of the superovulatory hormone (1000 IU of eCG, Folligon®, Intervet International BV, Boxmeer, the Netherlands) by mating with fertile males and injection immediately after copulation of either an IM dose of 0.0084 mg of buserelin acetate (Buserelina Zoovet®, Laboratorio Zoovet, Santa Fe, Argentina) to 10 alpacas (T1) or an IM dose of 5-mg Armour standard of LH (Lutropin®, Bioniche Animal Health, Belleville, ON, Canada) to 11 alpacas (T2). All alpacas had a second mating 12 h after the first mating and were subjected to ovarian inspection by ultrasonography and previous embryo collection by nonsurgical transcervical embryo flushing 6.5 days after the first mating. On average, the embryo recovery rate for T1 was 34.6% and there were 7.8 ± 3.99 corpora lutea (CL), 2.7 ± 4.08 collected embryos, and 3.6 ± 2.95 total, 0.5 ± 0.85 small (<6 mm), 1.8 ± 1.99 medium (=6 but =14 mm), and 1.3 ± 2.11 large (=15 mm) non-ovulated follicles. For T2, the embryo recovery rate was 59.4% and there were 6.73 ± 1.49 CL, 4.0 ± 2.57 collected embryos, and 0.64 ± 0.81 total, 0.0 ± 0.0 small, 0.36 ± 0.67 medium, and 0.27 ± 0.47 large non-ovulated follicles. The differences between treatments were nonsignificant (P > 0.05) for all the parameters; however, there was a clear tendency for a better recovery rate, more embryos collected, and lower number of non-ovulated follicles in T2. The Pearson correlation coefficient between the presence of large follicles in the ovaries at the time of embryo collection and the total number of embryos collected was negative (r = –0.26) and highly significant (P = 0.001). The use of LH for ovulation induction of superovulated alpacas seems to be more advisable than the use of GnRH agonist; further comparisons with larger number of observations per treatment are recommended. This study was financed by the Peruvian Fund for Innovation, Science and Technology (FINCYT).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.962
Threshold uncertainty score0.198

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Physiology in LivestockFrench-language works237,207