Echocardiography and pulmonary function testing in childhood onset systemic lupus erythematosus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this paper was to investigate the frequency of echocardiography (ECHO) and pulmonary function test (PFT) abnormalities in childhood onset systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and to determine the relationship of these abnormalities to disease activity. The charts of 50 patients with childhood onset SLE attending a pediatric rheumatology clinic were reviewed for ECHO and PFT studies. The frequency and description of ECHO and PFT abnormalities were documented. Possible associations of PFT and ECHO abnormalities with clinical cardiopulmonary disease, radiographic findings, and measures of lupus disease activity were evaluated. Forty patients (80%) had at least one ECHO study. Twenty-seven (68%) had an abnormal initial study. Nine of 14 patients with an initial abnormal ECHO had normal findings on repeated study. Three abnormalities were considered moderately severe. Thirty-three patients (66%) had at least one PFT performed. Sixteen (48%) were abnormal initially. Four of these 'abnormal' studies were repeated and the abnormalities persisted. Nine patients (27%) were considered to have a severe abnormality. Thirty-one children (62%) had both studies performed. An initial abnormal ECHO and abnormal PFT was found in 10 (32%) of these children. No relationship between ECHO or PFT abnormality and any measure of disease activity (physician's global assessment, anti DNA, C3 or ESR) could be found. Occult cardiac and pulmonary disease as demonstrated by ECHO or PFT occurs frequently in childhood onset SLE. If we wish to understand the natural history of these abnormal heart and lung findings, it will be necessary to do serial testing with ECHO and PFTs in this population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".