Affinities of Shiga toxins 1 and 2 for univalent and oligovalent Pk-trisaccharide analogs measured by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The binding stoichiometry and affinities of the Shiga toxins, Stx1 and Stx2, for a series of uni- and oligovalent analogs of the Pk-trisaccharide were measured using the direct electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ES-MS) assay. Importantly, it is shown that, for a given ligand, Stx1 and Stx2 exhibit similar affinities. The binding data suggest a high degree of similarity in the spatial arrangement and structural characteristics of the Pk binding sites in Stx1 and Stx2. The results confirm that both toxins recognize the alpha-D-Galp(1-->4)-beta-D-Galp(1-->4)-beta-D-Glcp carbohydrate motif of the cell surface glycolipid Gb3. This, taken together with the results of the chemical mapping study, suggests that the nature of the Pk binding interactions with Stx1 and Stx2 are similar. The affinities of Stx1-B(5) and Stx2 for the multivalent ligands reveals that site 2 of Stx2, which shares the same spatial arrangement as site 2 in Stx1, is the primary Pk binding site and that site 1 of Stx1 and of Stx2 can also participate in Pk binding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".