‘Down the rabbit hole’: enhancing the transition process for youth with cystic fibrosis and congenital heart disease by re‐imagining the future and time
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although the transition from paediatric to adult clinical care is an important one, the process is far from seamless. Little is known about the transition experiences of youth with cystic fibrosis (CF) and congenital heart disease (CHD). METHOD: Informed by the new social studies of childhood, this qualitative study adopted a thematic analytical approach in order to explore how 50 youth and 28 parents affected by CF and CHD at a large children's hospital in Canada negotiate constructions of 'normal developmental time'--in both anticipating and dealing with the transition from adolescence to adulthood. RESULTS: Illness appeared to render the future as an uncertain terrain for youth living with CF and CHD. Concerns related to deteriorating health and occupational restrictions in the future were paramount for these youth. For young women with CF and CHD, the loss of 'normal' gendered roles--such as motherhood--was also a distressing future concern. For youth living with CF and their parents in particular, time was thought to be stolen and the future was abbreviated. Despite these seemingly anxiety-inducing experiences, youth and their parents demonstrated considerable creativity as they devised strategies to deal with the future and stolen time. RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSION: In addition to challenging ideological assumptions about developmental time which may alienate youth with chronic illnesses, the results from this study suggest that attending to youth's temporal anxieties and future concerns may ultimately enhance the transition process for youth with CF and CHD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.013 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".