Effects of weekly regrouping of prepartum dairy cows on innate immune response and antibody concentration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives were to evaluate the effects of a stable prepartum grouping strategy on innate immune parameters, antibody concentration, and cortisol and haptoglobin concentrations of Jersey cows. Cows (253±3 d of gestation) were paired by gestation length and assigned randomly to the stable (all-in-all-out; AIAO) or traditional (TRD) treatment. In the AIAO treatment, groups of 44 cows were moved into a pen where they remained for 5 wk, whereas in the TRD treatment, approximately 10 cows were moved into a pen weekly to maintain stocking density (44 cows for 48 headlocks). Pens were identical in size and design and each pen received each treatment a total of 3 times (6 replicates; AIAO, n=259; TRD, n=308). A subgroup of cows (n=34/treatment) was selected on wk 1 of each replicate from which blood was sampled weekly from d -14 to 14 (d 0=calving) to determine polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMNL) phagocytosis, oxidative burst, and expression of CD18 and L-selectin, hemogram, cortisol and glucose concentrations, and haptoglobin concentration. Another subgroup of cows (n=40/treatment) selected on wk 1 of each replicate was treated with chicken egg ovalbumin on d -21, -7, and 7 and had blood sampled weekly from d -21 to 21 for determination of immunoglobulin G anti-ovalbumin. All cows (n=149) had blood sampled weekly for nonesterified fatty acid (NEFA) and β-hydroxybutyrate (BHBA) concentrations from d -21 to 21. Treatment did not affect percentage of PMNL positive for phagocytosis and oxidative burst (AIAO=64.3±2.9 vs. TRD=64.3±2.9%) and intensity of phagocytosis [AIAO=2,910.82±405.99 vs. TRD=2,981.52±406.87 geometric mean fluorescence intensity (GMFI)] and oxidative burst (AIAO=7,667.99±678.29 vs. TRD=7,742.70±682.91 GMFI). Similarly, treatment did not affect the percentage of PMNL expressing CD18 (AIAO=96.3±0.7 vs. TRD=97.8±0.7%) and L-selectin (AIAO=44.1±2.8 vs. TRD=45.1±2.8%) or the intensity of expression of CD18 (AIAO=3,496.2±396.5 vs. TRD=3,598.5±396.9 GMFI) and L-selectin (AIAO=949.8±22.0 vs. TRD=940.4±22.3 GMFI). Concentration of immunoglobulin G anti-ovalbumin was not affected by treatment (AIAO=0.98±0.05 vs. TRD=0.98±0.05 OD). The percentage of leukocytes classified as granulocyte (AIAO=38.9±1.5 vs. TRD 38.2±1.5%) and the granulocyte:lymphocyte ratio (AIAO=0.75±0.04 vs. TRD=0.75±0.04) were not affected by treatment. Concentrations of cortisol (AIAO=14.95±1.73 vs. TRD=18.07±1.73 ng/mL), glucose (AIAO=57.6±1.5 vs. TRD=60.0±1.5 ng/mL), and haptoglobin (AIAO=3.09±0.48 vs. TRD=3.51±0.49 OD) were not affected by treatment. According to the current experiment, a stable prepartum grouping strategy does not improve innate immune parameters or antibody concentration compared with weekly prepartum regrouping.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".