Interactions of antithrombin and proteins in the plasma contact activation system with immobilized functional heparin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The interactions of antithrombin (AT) and the contact phase clotting factors with two commercially available heparinized surfaces are reported. The Carmeda (CBAS) and Corline surfaces along with controls (a sulfonated polyethylene surface and a CBAS analog in which the heparin used was devoid of specific AT-binding sequences) were exposed to human plasma. Adsorbed proteins were eluted and examined by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting. The CBAS and Corline surfaces adsorbed large amounts of AT, whereas adsorption on the controls was negligible. Immunoblots for the four contact phase clotting factors indicated less contact activation on the CBAS and Corline surfaces than on the controls. Determination of adsorbed functional AT using a FXa inhibition assay showed that the CBAS surface adsorbed about 4 times as much AT as the Corline surface. Adsorption of AT to the control surfaces was minimal. Assays for adsorbed FXII and FXIIa based on kallikrein generation showed that all four surfaces adsorbed similar amounts of FXII. However, on the controls, most of the FXII was in activated form, whereas on the CBAS and Corline surfaces very little activation occurred.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".