MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125881801 · doi:10.4187/respcare.03480046

An In Vitro Study to Investigate the Use of a Breath-Actuated, Small-Volume, Pneumatic Nebulizer for the Delivery of Methacholine Chloride Bronchoprovocation Agent

2003· article· en· W2125881801 on OpenAlexaff
Jolyon P. Mitchell, Mark Nagel, Sara Lou Bates, Cathy Doyle

Bibliographic record

VenueRespiratory Care · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
Canadian institutionsTrudell Medical International (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNebulizerMouthpieceMedicineMethacholineAerosolizationAnesthesiaAerosolChromatographyInhalationBiomedical engineeringLungRespiratory diseaseChemistryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Current American Thoracic Society and American Association for Respiratory Care guidelines for the delivery of aerosol agents such as methacholine chloride (MC) for bronchoprovocation testing require the use of pneumatic jet nebulizers that have well-defined droplet size and mass output. A recently developed disposable, breath-actuated nebulizer (AeroEclipse) may offer bronchoprovocation testers an alternative to existing devices. METHODS: We studied the performance of 5 AeroEclipse nebulizers with regard to mass of MC delivered with various MC solution concentrations and numbers of inhalations, using a model of adult tidal breathing. Each nebulizer was operated with compressed air (8 L/min at 50 psig) and an initial fill of 2 mL. MC solutions with mass concentrations of 0.25, 0.98, 3.85, and 15.70 mg/mL were tested. The total mass of MC delivered was determined after 5, 10, and 15 complete breathing cycles, by assaying the MC collected on a filter placed at the nebulizer mouthpiece. The aerosol droplet size distribution, fine droplet fraction (FDF) (percentage of droplets < 4.8 microm diameter), and fine droplet mass (FDM) (mass of droplets < 4.8 microm diameter) were determined by laser diffractometry, using physiologically normal saline as a surrogate for MC solution. RESULTS: The mean +/- SD FDM collected in 5 breathing cycles was 654 +/- 29 microg with the 15.70 mg/mL solution, 158 +/- 9 microg with the 3.85 mg/mL solution, 37 +/- 3 microg with the 0.98 mg/mL solution, and 7 +/- 2 microg with the 0.25 mg/mL solution. FDM showed a linear correlation (r(2) = 0.9999) with MC concentration, within the range studied. FDM also showed a linear correlation (r(2) = 0.999) with the number of breathing cycles. For instance, with the 15.70 mg/mL solution, FDM was 654 +/- 29 microg with 5 breathing cycles, 1,228 +/- 92 microg with 10 breathing cycles, and 1,876 +/- 132 microg with 15 breathing cycles. CONCLUSIONS: Although the bronchoprovocation test procedure had to be slightly modified from the guidelines to accommodate the operation of the AeroEclipse's breath-actuation feature, our measurements indicate that a predictable dose of MC, within the useful range for bronchoprovocation testing, can be delivered to an adult patient breathing tidally. The green indicator on the AeroEclipse could be used to coach the patient to inhale for a specific period, thereby controlling MC delivery per breathing cycle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.551

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRespiratory CareSame topicInhalation and Respiratory Drug DeliveryFrench-language works237,207