<i>In vivo</i> expression of G‐protein β<sub>1</sub>γ<sub>2</sub> dimer in adult mouse skeletal muscle alters L‐type calcium current and excitation–contraction coupling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A number of G-protein-coupled receptors are expressed in skeletal muscle but their roles in muscle physiology and downstream effector systems remain poorly investigated. Here we explored the functional importance of the G-protein betagamma (Gbetagamma) signalling pathway on voltage-controlled Ca(2+) homeostasis in single isolated adult skeletal muscle fibres. A GFP-tagged Gbeta(1)gamma(2) dimer was expressed in vivo in mice muscle fibres. The GFP fluorescence pattern was consistent with a Gbeta(1)gamma(2) dimer localization in the transverse-tubule membrane. Membrane current and indo-1 fluorescence measurements performed under voltage-clamp conditions reveal a drastic reduction of both L-type Ca(2+) current density and of peak amplitude of the voltage-activated Ca(2+) transient in Gbeta(1)gamma(2)-expressing fibres. These effects were not observed upon expression of Gbeta(2)gamma(2), Gbeta(3)gamma(2) or Gbeta(4)gamma(2). Our data suggest that the G-protein beta(1)gamma(2) dimer may play an important regulatory role in skeletal muscle excitation-contraction coupling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".