Rapid Distortion of Homogeneous Turbulence Between Cylinders
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of ‘half-full-half’ cylinders on the distortion of a turbulent flow are experimentally investigated. A single hot-wire anemometry unit is used to measure the stream-wise parameters of the flow. The cylinders are 15.2 cm (6 in) in diameter and 76.2 cm (30 in) in height installed in a closed loop wind tunnel with a 76.2 cm by 76.2 cm (30 in by 30 in) cross section. Turbulent flow with a nominal mean velocity of 7.6 m/s was generated by means of a perforated plate situated at the entrance of the wind tunnel. It was found that the mean velocity increases significantly as the flow passes through the contracting passage created by the cylinders, whereas the rms turbulence intensity decreases about 12% but shows an increase of up to 14% very close to the full cylinder. As the flow was distorted, the Kolmogorov length scales were elongated in the stream-wise direction, resulting in a decrease in the rate of turbulence decay which appears as a decrease in energy dissipation rate. The stream-wise integral length scales also increased due to the elongation of eddies in the stream-wise direction. Also, analysis of the turbulence fluctuating velocity in the frequency domain showed a redistribution of stream-wise turbulence kinetic energy from large to small scales during the distortion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".