Seasons of Supervision: Reflections on Three Decades of Supervision in Counsellor Education
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article documents a thematic retrospective of counsellor supervision from two of Canada’s most experienced counsellor educators/supervisors, based at the University of Alberta. Guided by prominent motifs in the counselling literature, the third author invited his colleagues to reflect in an interview on themes and issues they faced during their extensive experience supervising counsellors in university-based counsellor educa-tion programs. The article concludes with speculations about future directions in coun-sellor supervision and in their own practices. Cet article décrit une rétrospective thématique de la supervision des conseillers faite par deux des formateurs-superviseurs les plus expérimentés au Canada, et qui sont basés à l’Université de l’Alberta. Guidé par des motifs importants dans la littérature du counseling, le troisième auteur a invité ses collègues à discuter en entrevue des thèmes et enjeux auxquels ils ont été confrontés au cours de leur longue carrière de conseillers-superviseurs dans des programmes universitaires de formation des conseillers. En con-clusion, les auteurs spéculent sur l’orientation future de cette supervision et sur celle que pourrait prendre leurs propres pratiques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".