MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126020077 · doi:10.1002/jnr.20577

General anesthetics attenuate gap junction coupling in P19 cell line

2005· article· en· W2126020077 on OpenAlexafffund
Kirsten Wentlandt, Peter L. Carlen, Moshe Kushnir, Christian C. Naus, Hossam El‐Beheiry

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuroscience Research · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicConnexins and lens biology
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersCanadian Anesthesiologists' Society
KeywordsGap junctionCalceinHalothaneBiophysicsFlow cytometryChemistryAnestheticCoupling (piping)IntracellularAnesthesiaMedicineMaterials scienceBiologyBiochemistryImmunologyMembrane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gap junction communication is widespread throughout the mammalian nervous system among neurons as well as glia. We addressed the hypothesis that general anesthetics attenuate gap junction mediated coupling in P19 cell line that can differentiate into neuronal-like cells and astrocytes and oligodendrocytes. We characterized the extent of dye coupling over time in the P19 cell line using colocalization of chlormethylbenzamido-1,1 dioctadecyl-3,3,3',3'-tetramethylindocarbocyamine (CM-DiI) and calcein-AM in donor and recipient cells in cocultures. After seeding, the gap junction permeant dye calcein spreads from donor to recipient cells. CM-DiI and calcein fluorescence identified donor and recipient cells, respectively. The extent of intercellular connections was evaluated using cell counting and flow cytometry up to 2 hr after treatment. Clinically relevant concentrations of the intravenous anesthetics propofol (15 microM) and thiopental (10 microM) attenuated gap junction permeability in P19 cell cultures. In contrast, halothane, a volatile anesthetic in a concentration (0.64 mM) relevant to its free aqueous EC50 had no effect on gap junction coupling; however, very high halothane concentrations (2.8 mM) blocked dye transfer by approximately 90%. The results indicate that halothane concentrations pertinent to clinical anesthesia were unable to attenuate gap junction communication in a cell line that can express neuronal and glial gap junction proteins; however, clinically relevant concentrations of propofol and thiopental depressed gap junction coupling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.414
Threshold uncertainty score0.247

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neuroscience ResearchSame topicConnexins and lens biologyFrench-language works237,207