HOLOTYPE SNOUT ELEMENTS OF SANIWA ENSIDENS REASSIGNED TO CF. RESTES SP. INDET. (XENOSAURIDAE)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During the field season of 1870, F. V. Hayden collected a number of sandstone blocks that contained the remains of a large fossil lizard (Middle Eocene Bridger Formation, Sweetwater County, Wyoming). Though mostly unprepared, the visible bones were described by Leidy (1870) as Saniwa ensidens (USNM 2185; holotype). Fifty years later all the blocks associated with USNM 2185 were prepared prior to Gilmore's (1922) more complete description of Saniwa ensidens and his assignment of the taxon to the Varanoidea. Gilmore (1922) notes that the skeletal remains in the blocks were partially disarticulated to dissociated despite the excellent articulation of some components (e.g., palatal elements and right and left maxillary fragments [Gilmore, 1922, p. 809; pl. 1). Gilmore (1928) altered the diagnosis of Saniwa ensidens (USNM 2185) by adding characterizations of a premaxilla, right and left anterior maxillary fragments, and anterior tips of the dentaries. Gilmore (1928, p. 57) stated that these missing elements were found after further preparation of the blocks when the type specimen was mounted for display.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".