Decrease of airway smooth muscle contractility induced by simulated breathing maneuvers is not simply proportional to strain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The lung is a dynamic organ and the oscillating stress applied to the airway wall during breathing maneuvers can decrease airway smooth muscle (ASM) contractility. However, it is unclear whether it is the stress or the attendant strain that is responsible for the decline of ASM force associated with breathing maneuvers, and whether tone can prevent the decline of force by attenuating the strain. To investigate these questions, ovine tracheal strips were subjected to oscillating stress that simulates breathing maneuvers, and the resulting strain and decline of force were measured in the absence or presence of different levels of tone elicited by acetylcholine. In relaxed ASM, high stress simulating 20 cm H(2)O-transpulmonary pressure excursions strained ASM strips by 20.7% and decreased force by 17.1%. When stress oscillations were initiated during measurement of ACh concentration-response curves, tone almost abrogated strain at an ACh concentration of 10(-6) M (1.1%) but the decline of force was not affected (18.9%). When stress oscillations were initiated after ACh-induced contraction had reached its maximal force, strain was almost abrogated at an ACh concentration of 10(-6) M (0.9%) and the decline of force was attenuated (10.1%). However, even at the highest ACh concentration (10(-4) M), substantial decline of force (6.1%) was still observed despite very small strain (0.7%). As expected, the results indicate that tone attenuated the strain experienced by ASM during breathing maneuver simulations. More surprisingly, the reduction of strain induced by tone was not proportional to its effect on the decline of force induced by simulated breathing maneuvers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".