Solution‐phase submonomer diversification of aza‐dipeptide building blocks and their application in aza‐peptide and aza‐DKP synthesis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aza-peptides have been used as tools for studying SARs in programs aimed at drug discovery and chemical biology. Protected aza-dipeptides were synthesized by a solution-phase submonomer approach featuring alkylation of N-terminal benzophenone semicarbazone aza-Gly-Xaa dipeptides using different alkyl halides in the presence of potassium tert-butoxide as base. Benzophenone protected aza-dipeptide tert-butyl ester 31c was selectively deprotected at the C-terminal ester or N-terminal hydrazone to afford, respectively, aza-dipeptide acid and amine building blocks 36c and 40c, which were introduced into longer aza-peptides. Alternatively, removal of the benzophenone semicarbazone protection from aza-dipeptide methyl esters 29a-c led to intramolecular cyclization to produce aza-DKPs 39a-c. In light of the importance of aza-peptides and DKPs as therapeutic agents and probes of biological processes, this diversity-oriented solution-phase approach may provide useful tools for studying peptide science.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".