MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126164926 · doi:10.1353/esc.2007.0032

Twenty-first Century Global Sex Trafficking: Migration, Capitalism, Class, and Challenges for Feminism Now

2005· article· en· W2126164926 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Marjorie Stone

Bibliographic record

VenueEnglish studies in Canada · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSex work and related issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGirlFeminismGender studiesCapitalismSociologySex traffickingHistoryLawPolitical scienceCriminologyPsychologyPoliticsHuman trafficking

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Twenty-first Century Global Sex Trafficking:Migration, Capitalism, Class, and Challenges for Feminism Now Marjorie Stone (bio) There were so many young girls in there. They were from Moldova, Romania, Ukraine and Bulgaria. Some were crying. Others looked terrified. We were told not to speak to each other.…All the time, very mean and ugly men came in and dragged girls into rooms. Sometimes they would rape girls in front of us. They yelled at them, ordering them to move in certain ways … to pretend excitement … Those who resisted were beaten. If they did not cooperate, they were locked in dark cellars with rats or no food and water for three days. One girl refused to submit to anal sex, and that night the owner brought in five men. They held her on the floor and every one of them had anal sex on her in front of all of us. She screamed and screamed, … In a chapter on "The Breaking Grounds" in The Natashas: The New Global Sex Trade (2003), Canadian journalist Victor Malarek interviews a young woman named Sophia describing how trafficked women and girls were "broken in" for service in the sex trade in Kosovo. Initially Sofia thinks, "I will fight back," then watches as another woman who does resist is burned with cigarettes "all over her arms," "attacked … anally," and beaten unconscious until she is "no longer breathing. There was no worry on the faces [End Page 31] of the owners. They simply carried her out" (33–34). Trafficking in human beings is "now the third-largest moneymaking venture in the world, after illegal weapons and drugs," Malarek observes (4). A 2005 International Labour Organization report estimates that among the 8.1 million persons in forced labour by private agents and enterprises globally (excluding those coerced by states, the army, or rebel military groups), 2.5 million are trafficked. Of these more than half, 1.4 to 1.7 million, are "in forced commercial sexual exploitation" ranging along a continuum from debt bondage and intimidation to incarceration, rape, terrorism, and torture.1 Despite the measures thus far taken by NGOs such as the Global Alliance Against Trafficking in Women (GAATW), the UN (through its 2000 Palermo Protocol against trafficking), the European Union, and by various governments, sex trafficking is not declining but is growing in scope, sophistication, and invisibility, as Paolo Monzini and Marco Gramenga, among many others, document.2 Driven by global inequities, growing numbers of migrants working in the sex industry, and structural readjustments in the developing world, the former Soviet Union, and Eastern Europe, sex trafficking is also increasingly networked with the drug trade, the trade in human organs, prostitution networks, internet pornography, mail-order bride operations, and sex tourism.3 Minors are also increasingly among those exploited, like the children trafficked back and forth across the Mexican–U.S. border described by Peter Landesman in a January 2004, New York Times story.4 Malarek and Monzini both note that, notwithstanding progressive human rights initiatives, the UN and the U.S. have themselves substantially contributed to trafficking through the ineffectual regulation of peace-keeping troops in places such as Bosnia or the effects of military bases in Asia.5 While the U.S. initiation of its State [End Page 32] Department's annual "Traffic in Person" audit in 2000 created measures to counteract trafficking by ranking countries according to their success in regulating it, Malarek notes that the effectiveness of the TIP audits has increasingly been hollowed out by the political reasons seeming to govern the movement of countries from the lower ranks of Tier Three—for countries not meeting or attempting to meet minimal standards in counteracting trafficking—to Tier One, for countries said to be in full compliance with "minimum standards" (187).6 Nor does the U.S. State Department "consider that the vast majority of men using trafficked women either at home or outside their borders are from the … well-heeled nations sitting smugly on Tier One" (Malarek 205). Sex and forced labour trafficking in its more extreme forms is the slave trade of the twenty-first century and arguably the greatest human rights challenge we may now face...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.663
Threshold uncertainty score0.671

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnglish studies in CanadaSame topicSex work and related issuesFrench-language works237,207