MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126250979 · doi:10.1093/icb/44.1.71

Adaptive Mechanisms of Spinal Locomotion in Cats

2004· article· en· W2126250979 on OpenAlexaff
Serge Rossignol

Bibliographic record

VenueIntegrative and Comparative Biology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicVeterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpinal cordCATSDenervationMedicineHindlimbSpinal cord injuryNeurosciencePeripheralAnatomyTreadmillPhysical medicine and rehabilitationBiologyPhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper reviews some aspects of locomotor plasticity after spinalisation and after peripheral nerve lesions. Adult cats can recover spontaneous hindlimb locomotion on a treadmill several days or weeks after a complete section of the spinal cord at T13. The kinematics as well as the electromyographic activity are compared in the same animal before and after the spinal section to highlight the resemblance of locomotor characteristics in the two conditions. To study further the mechanisms of spinal plasticity potentially underlying such locomotor recovery, we also summarize the locomotor adaptation of cats submitted to various types of peripheral nerve section of either ankle flexor or extensor muscles or after denervation of the hindpaws' cutaneous inputs. It is argued that, even in the spinal state, cats have the ability to compensate for such lesions of the peripheral nervous system suggesting that the spinal cord has a significant potential for adaptive plasticity that could be used in rehabilitation strategies to restore locomotion after spinal cord injury.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.178
Threshold uncertainty score0.592

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.171
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIntegrative and Comparative BiologySame topicVeterinary Orthopedics and NeurologyFrench-language works237,207