Randomized codon mutagenesis reveals that the HIV Rev arginine‐rich motif is robust to substitutions and that double substitution of two critical residues alters specificity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The binding of the arginine-rich motif (ARM) of HIV Rev protein to its high-affinity site in stem IIB in the Rev response element (RRE) initiates assembly of a ribonucleoprotein complex that mediates the export of essential, incompletely spliced viral transcripts. Many biochemical, genetic, and structural studies of Rev-RRE IIB have been published, yet the roles of many peptide residues in Rev ARM are unconfirmed by mutagenesis. Rev aptamer I (RAI) is an optimized RRE IIB that binds Rev with higher affinity and for which mutational data are sparse. Randomized-codon libraries of Rev ARM were assayed for their ability to bind RRE IIB and RAI using a bacterial reporter system based on bacteriophage λ N-nut antitermination. Most Rev ARM residues tolerated substitutions without strong loss of binding to RRE IIB, and all except arginine 39 tolerated substitution without strong loss of binding to RAI. The pattern of critical Rev residues is not the same for RRE IIB and RAI, suggesting important differences between the interactions. The results support and aid the interpretation of existing structural models. Observed clinical variation is consistent with additional constraints on Rev mutation. By chance, we found double mutants of two highly critical residues, arginine 35 (to glycine) and asparagine 40 (to valine or lysine), that bind RRE IIB well, but not RAI. That an apparently distinct binding mode occurs with only two mutations highlights the ability of ARMs to evolve new recognition strategies and supports the application of neutral theories of evolution to protein-RNA recognition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".