MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126429687 · doi:10.1139/b01-084

Gene sequence analysis of an opportunistic wheat pathogen, an isolate of<i>Fusarium proliferatum</i>

2001· article· en· W2126429687 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sun-Il Kwon, Carol D. von Dohlen, Anne J. Anderson

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Botany · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUtah Agricultural Experiment StationU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsFusarium proliferatumBiologyBotanyChlamydosporePotato dextrose agarFusariumGeneConidiumRibosomal RNAPhylogenetic treeEndophyteRibosomal DNAMicrobiologyAgarGeneticsBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A fungal endophyte of wheat causing seedling necrosis when plants are grown under stressed conditions was identified as a Fusarium proliferatum (Matsushima) Nirenberg isolate (NRRL 31017). The wheat isolate grew rapidly on potato dextrose agar as lanose to cottony colonies and rarely produced macroconidia under ultraviolet light. Microconidia were produced both in false heads and chains; sporodochia and chlamydospores were not found. Phylogenetic analysis of the nucleotide sequences of the genes for β-tubulin, mitochondrial small subunit ribosomal DNA, calmodulin, and elongation factor 1-α from the wheat isolate showed affinity with other F. proliferatum isolates. The closest relationship was with an isolate with ligninolytic potential obtained from forest litter in Spain (F. proliferatum MUCL 31970). Nucleotide sequences of genes encoding laccases, which are quite divergent between fungal species, showed 99% identity between the wheat and the forest litter isolates.Key words: Fusarium proliferatum, laccase, phylogeny, genetic variability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of BotanySame topicPlant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesFrench-language works237,207