MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126530167 · doi:10.1586/ern.10.31

Genetics of medulloblastoma: clues for novel therapies

2010· review· en· W2126530167 on OpenAlexaff
Sara Onvani, Arnold B. Etame, Christian A. Smith, James T. Rutka

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Review of Neurotherapeutics · 2010
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHedgehog Signaling Pathway Studies
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedulloblastomaCarcinogenesisDiseaseRadiation therapyBioinformaticsTargeted therapyBiologyMedicineComputational biologyOncologyCancer researchInternal medicineCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Medulloblastoma is the most common malignant brain tumor in children. Current medulloblastoma therapy entails surgery, radiation and chemotherapy. The 5-year survival rate for patients ranges from 40 to 70%, with most survivors suffering from serious long-term treatment-related sequelae. Additional research on the molecular biology and genetics of medulloblastoma is needed to identify robust prognostic markers for disease-risk stratification, to improve current treatment regimes and to discover novel and more effective molecular-targeted therapies. Recent advances in molecular biology have led to the development of powerful tools for the study of medulloblastoma tumorigenesis, which have revealed new insights into the molecular underpinnings of this disease. Here we discuss the signaling pathway alterations implicated in medulloblastoma pathogenesis, the techniques used in molecular profiling of these tumors and recent molecular subclassification schemes. Particular emphasis is given to the identification of novel molecular targets for less toxic, patient-tailored therapeutic approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Review of NeurotherapeuticsSame topicHedgehog Signaling Pathway StudiesFrench-language works237,207