Size-dependent foraging of larval Atlantic cod (<i>Gadus morhua</i>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Most marine fish larvae are thought to be gape-limited predators, and the presence of suitably sized prey at the appropriate time in the foraging environment is a key factor for their growth and survival. Two experiments were carried out: in experiment 1, we investigated feeding of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L., 1758) larvae from 5 to 35 days post hatch on prey of three different sizes: two different-sized strains of rotifers, small rotifers (SR) and large rotifers (LR), and Artemia Leach, 1819 nauplii (AN), or an equal mixture of the three types of prey (MIX). In experiment 2, cod larvae were fed SR, LR, or a combination of SR and LR (MIX-R) at concentrations of 1500 and 4000 prey·L –1 from 4 to 20 days post hatch. Feeding incidence, number of prey in the gut, mouth gape, and prey selection were measured. In experiment 1, feeding incidence was initially higher in the SR treatment, while larvae failed to start feeding in either the LR or the AN treatment at 5 dph. Larvae in the LR treatment started feeding at 8 dph, and feeding incidence was comparable to that in the SR treatment, but the total number of prey eaten was higher in the SR than in the LR treatment until 20 dph. Larvae did not start feeding on AN until 26 dph, although they attacked them from 5 dph. In the MIX-R treatment in experiment 2, larvae fed selectively on LR at 4000 prey·L –1 , whereas no selection was observed at 1500 prey·L –1 . Our results suggest that cod larvae are gape-limited predators and the concentration of prey affects prey selection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".