MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126614127 · doi:10.1093/humrep/dev018

Estrogen induced changes in uterine brain-derived neurotrophic factor and its receptors

2015· article· en· W2126614127 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Jocelyn M. Wessels, Nicholas Leyland, Sanjay K. Agarwal, Warren G. Foster

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Reproduction · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNerve injury and regeneration
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMcMaster University
KeywordsEstrogenReceptorEndocrinologyEstrogen receptorInternal medicineMedicineNeurotrophic factorsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

STUDY QUESTION: Are brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and its receptors, NTRK2, NGFR and SORT1, regulated by ovarian steroids in the uterus? SUMMARY ANSWER: BDNF and its low affinity receptor, nerve growth factor receptor (NGFR), are regulated by estradiol in the uterus. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Recent studies have revealed a central role for neurotrophins in placental development, endometrial stem cell neurogenesis, endometrial carcinoma and endometriosis. Complex signaling pathways involving BDNF and its receptors are regulated by ovarian hormones in the brain, however their expression and regulation in the uterus is poorly defined. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This experimental animal study involved a total of 80 mice. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Female C57BL/6 mice (n = 50) were monitored daily for estrous cycle stage, and uterine horns were collected. A second group of mice (n = 30) were ovariectomized and given estradiol, progesterone, estradiol + progesterone, or saline for 4 days. Uterine expression of BDNF and its receptors were quantified by real-time PCR and western blot, and localized using immunohistochemistry. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: During the estrous cycle, expression of BDNF, NTRK2 and SORT1 remained constant, while NGFR declined 11-fold from pro-estrus through to diestrus (P = 0.005). In ovariectomized mice, estradiol treatment increased uterine expression of mature BDNF greater than 6-fold (P = 0.013, 25 kDa; P = 0.003, 27 kDa), pro-BDNF 5-fold (P = 0.041, 37 kDa band; P = 0.046, 40 kDa band), and NGFR 5-fold (P < 0.001) when compared with other treatments. NTRK2 and SORT1 were unaffected by ovarian hormones. NGFR was primarily localized in epithelial cells in mice in diestrus or in ovariectomized mice treated with progesterone (P ≤ 0.001; P ≤ 0.001, respectively). In contrast, NGFR switched to a stromal localization in ovariectomized mice administered estradiol (P = 0.002). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study was performed in one only species. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Results of this study demonstrate the uterine regulation of BDNF and NGFR by estradiol, and highlight the striking difference between hormone exposure during the estrous cycle and daily estradiol exposure after ovariectomy on neurotrophin expression in the uterus. The results also show the spatial regulation of NGFR in the uterus in response to ovarian hormones. Sustained estrogen exposure, as seen in estrogen-dependent disease, may alter the delicate neurotrophin balance and inappropriately activate potent BDNF-NTRK2 pathways which are capable of contributing to endometrial pathology. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This study was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) (W.G.F.), a NSERC Discovery Grant (W.G.F.), and a Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship-CIHR (J.M.W.). J.M.W. is a member of the CIHR sponsored Reproduction and Early Development in Health training program. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.446

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.157
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman ReproductionSame topicNerve injury and regenerationFrench-language works237,207