Minimizing the Risks Associated with Significant QTc Prolongation in People with Schizophrenia: A Consensus Statement by The Cardiac Safety in Schizophrenia Group
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cardiac Safety in Schizophrenia Group Objectes: This study was designed to help identify and clarify issues associated with cardiac safety in schizophrenia, particularly QTc interval prolongation; to raise awareness among psychiatrists of the cardiac issues involved in prescribing for schizophrenia and help psychiatrists minimise the potential cardiac risks associated with treating schizophrenia. Methods: The currently available literature on cardiac dysfunction associated with antipsychotic treatments was reviewed by an independent panel of international psychiatric and cardiology experts. Following individual review, a joint meeting was held and a consensus statement produced. Results: Prolongation of QTc interval is relatively common among antipsychotic drugs although there is marked variation in the extent to which the different agents exert their effect. If a patient is considered to be at high risk of significantly prolonged QTc interval (e.g. increasing age, female gender, comorbid cardiovascular disease) prescription of an antipsychotic drug with low QTc prolonging potential is recommended. Evaluation of a patient's risk factors for significant QTc prolongation is an important part of patient assessment at presentation. To significantly reduce the risk of morbidity and mortality from prolonged QTc interval a team approach involving the hospital emergency psychiatric care team, the office-based psychiatrist, the primary care physician, the cardiologist and the pharmacist is advocated. Conclusions: Significant QTc interval prolongation caused by some antipsychotics is a risk factor that may lead to sudden death in patients with schizophrenia receiving these medications. Not all antipsychotic drugs prolong QTc interval. Careful clinical and pharmacological management of the patient with schizophrenia can significantly reduce the risks of morbidity and mortality from QTc interval prolongation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".