MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126669697 · doi:10.1109/have.2008.4685298

A distributed latency-aware architecture for massively multi-user virtual environments

2008· article· en· W2126669697 on OpenAlexaff
Behnoosh Hariri, Saurabh Ratti, Shervin Shirmohammadi, Mohammad Reza Pakravan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPeer-to-Peer Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceHilbert curveDistributed computingRouting (electronic design automation)Computer networkTheoretical computer scienceAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Massively multi-user virtual environments (MMVE) incorporate computer graphics, sound and haptics to simulate the experience of real-time interaction among multiple users in a shared three-dimensional virtual world. Such applications therefore deal with the distribution of updates among their users to provide them with a common sense of time and place while interacting in the virtual environment. This paper introduces a new distributed architecture for message exchange in MMVE applications. We propose the use of Hilbert space filling curve, due to its good locality preserving characteristics, as a mechanism for indexing users' three dimensional locations to a one dimension. We also propose our novel routing strategy based on this architecture, which is executed among the points that are mapped over the Hilbert curve. Such hierarchical routing requires only few entries in the routing tables while it is guaranteed to converge in few steps. The routing procedure is based on guiding the packets to their destinations through traversing the Hilbert curve in tree format. A three dimensional Hilbert curve of order K can be described with a tree of K levels. In making a forwarding decision, a node finds the best neighbour that moves the message closer to its destination over this tree. This avoids the complexity of locating the points over the Hilbert curve as the mapping is actually performed throughout the routing process. The performance evaluation results show that the propose architecture can efficiently handle update exchange among MMVE users.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPeer-to-Peer Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207