The index influenza A virus subtype H5N1 isolated from a human in 1997 differs in its receptor-binding properties from a virulent avian influenza virus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To gain insight into the events that occur when avian influenza viruses are transmitted to humans, the receptor-binding properties of the index H5N1 influenza virus isolated from a human in 1997 and the A/turkey/Ontario/7732/66 (H5N9) virus were compared, by using a haemadsorption assay. Cells expressing the haemagglutinin (HA) of the human isolate were adsorbed by both chicken red blood cells (RBCs) and human RBCs; those expressing the avian virus HA were only adsorbed by chicken RBCs. These results indicate that human and avian influenza virus H5 HAs differ in their recognition of sialyloligosaccharides on the RBCs of different animal species. Mutational analyses indicated that differences in both the oligosaccharide chains and in the amino acid sequences around the HA receptor-binding site were responsible for this difference in receptor binding. These data further support the concept that alteration in receptor recognition is important for replication of avian viruses in humans.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".