MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126676038 · doi:10.5858/2002-126-0173-tuotpa

The use of TaqMan PCR assay for detection of Bordetella pertussis infection from clinical specimens.

2002· article· en· W2126676038 on OpenAlexaff
Edward K. L. Chan, Nick A. Antonishyn, Ryan McDonald, Tara Maksymiw, Peter Pieroni, Evelyn Nagle, Greg B. Horsman

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicBacterial Infections and Vaccines
Canadian institutionsSaskatchewan Disease Control Laboratory
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTaqManBordetella pertussisWhooping coughMicrobiologyPolymerase chain reactionMedicineVirologyBordetella bronchisepticaReal-time polymerase chain reactionAgarBiologyBacteriaGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: The routine clinical laboratory detection of Bordetella pertussis is through culture, which can require 5 to 7 days for the bacteria to grow. Using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay can shorten this detection time while increasing the sensitivity of detection with similar specificity. This study compared culture with TaqMan PCR for detection of B pertussis in clinical specimens and the turnaround time for each assay during the pertussis season. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nasopharyngeal swabs in Regan-Lowe transport media were collected from 1556 persons who had symptoms of whooping cough or who had had contact with infected persons; the swabs were submitted for B pertussis detection during the pertussis season. A single nasopharyngeal swab from each patient was submitted for both culture and TaqMan PCR detection. Upon receipt of the specimens, the swabs were inoculated onto Regan-Lowe agar for culture and incubated for up to 7 days. The same swab was processed for PCR detection using TaqMan PCR assay. A second nested PCR was used on positive specimens for resolution purposes. The TaqMan PCR assay was performed 3 to 5 days a week, whereas the culture was performed 6 days a week. All specimens were processed on the same day or earliest possible working day for TaqMan or culture, and specimens queued for resolution by nested PCR were batched. RESULTS: There were a total of 275 PCR positives and 28 culture positives. After resolution with the second nested PCR, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 100%, 97.4%, 87.6%, and 100% for TaqMan PCR and 11.6%, 100%, 100%, and 85.7% for culture. The average turnaround time for positive culture was 5.1 days, and the average turnaround time for PCR was 2.3 days. CONCLUSION: The TaqMan PCR assay has superior sensitivity and shorter turnaround time over culture because it can be finished within one working day. Furthermore, the same swab can be used for culture of the bacteria for antibiotic susceptibility testing. The early detection of pertussis using TaqMan PCR assay allows early intervention on the spread of the disease and the ability to culture the bacteria from the same swab, thereby eliminating the need for a second swab and allowing for detection of antibiotic resistance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicBacterial Infections and VaccinesFrench-language works237,207